Posts

Showing posts with the label High Court

Central Government News

IMPORTANT JUDGEMENT- OFFICIAL RETIRED ON 30TH JUNE IS ELIGIBLE FOR INCREMENT DUE ON 1ST JULY NOTIONALLY FOR PENSIONARY BENEFITS

IMPORTANT JUDGEMET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 15.09.2017 CORAM THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE HULUVADI G.RAMESH AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN W.P.No.15732 of 2017 P.Ayyamperumal … Petitioner -vs- 1.The Registrar, Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench, High Court Complex, Chennai-600 105. 2.Union of Indirep.by the Chairman, CBEC, North Block, New Delhi-110 001. 3.Union of India rep.by Department of Personnel & Training New Delhi. 4.The Director of General (Inspection), Customs & Central Excise, “D” Block, I.P.Bhawan, I.P.Estate, New Delhi-110 002. .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the first respondent in O.A./310/00917/2015 dated 21.03.2017 and quash the same and consequently direct the fourth respondent to treat the retirement date of the petitioner as on 01.07.2013 and grant all the consequential benef...

Government can not accommodate employee in lower pay scale because of disability: High Court

Government can not accommodate employee in lower pay scale because of disability: High Court The Allahabad High Court has held that the government cannot accommodate an employee in a post with a lower pay scale just because he or she acquired some disability during service and became unfit for the current post. A bench comprising justices Bharati Sapru and Siddharth passed the order while dismissing a petition filed by the Ministry of Railways. The court directed the ministry to pay S Q Ahmed (accommodated on a post with lower pay scale because he acquired some disability) his dues according to higher pay grade with 7 per cent interest from the due date. It also imposed a cost of Rs 50,000 on railways for not giving its employee his legitimate dues and for dragging him into litigation for no fault on his part. In its petition, the Centre challenged an order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal directing the Ministry of Railways to pay Ahmad his salary and other dues according ...